Philips farm could
be a model community
By JOHN IKERD
Published Sunday, January 26, 2003
Recent articles in the Tribune concerning the pending purchase of
the Philips farm seem to offer hope for responsible development
of this property. For some time now, the Little Bonne Femme
Watershed Partnership group has been advocating "planned
development" of this 500-acre tract as part of a comprehensive
land-use plan for the entire watershed. This latest proposal
could represent an important step toward this goal.
The Philips tract is located between Clear Creek and Gans Creek,
which converge in Rock Bridge Memorial State Park to form Little Bonne
Femme Creek. Thus, development of the Philips tract has important
implications for the ecological integrity of Rock Bridge State Park as
well as for private property values in both watersheds. Gans Creek has
been designated by the state as an outstanding state resource water.
Thus, any development resulting in the degradation of water quality in
Gans Creek would violate Missouri state codes protecting water
quality. Clear Creek could not be designated an outstanding state
resource water because of existing development in the watershed, but
it is no less important to the ecology of Rock Bridge State Park than
is Gans Creek. The Clear Creek and Gans Creek watersheds together
constitute the "upper" Little Bonne Femme watershed. Intensive
development within any part of this watershed would limit development
potential elsewhere in the watershed and thus would affect property
values throughout the watershed. A comprehensive land-use plan for the
entire watershed is the only logical means of protecting private as
well as public interests in the area.
These ecological considerations need not preclude development of
the Philips tract or of any other tract of land within this watershed.
Any development in the Little Bonne Femme watershed, however, must
respect property rights of all, including the rights of the people of
Missouri to protect the state’s valuable and irreplaceable natural
resources, notably Rock Bridge State Park. We hope those putting forth
the latest development proposal are willing to recognize and accept
this basic land-use principle.
According to the recent Tribune articles, the prospective developer
wants to "formulate a comprehensive plan for the whole tract." Also,
the developer reportedly has had discussions with the city about using
200 acres of the tract for a park. In addition, Columbia City
Councilman John John, an agent for the developer, has indicated a
potential willingness to limit the amount of impervious surface in the
development to "30 percent." These statements suggest a climate
favorable for responsible development. Some people might "want to see
cows out there forever," as John suggests. The primary interest of our
group, however, is to ensure this development is compatible with a
responsible comprehensive land-use plan for the watershed.
Development of the Philips property need not be delayed by creation
of such a comprehensive watershed plan. An initial "sketch plan" could
be drawn indicating the general types of development - residential,
commercial, offices, green space, etc., appropriate for the entire
watershed. Such a plan would be based on general indicators of
ecological risks associated with each basic type of development,
including percent of impervious surface, required distance from
streams, etc. The "sketch plan" should allow private landowners to
realize the economic potential of their property, but to do so in a
way that recognizes the public interest in protecting valuable natural
resources. Planned development of the Philips tract could proceed once
an acceptable "sketch plan" for the watershed is in place to ensure
the compatibility of the Philips development with the land-use plans
for the watershed as a whole.
Apparently, details of the current Philips proposal are not
available for public discussion. However, we hope this plan might
include a few key provisions that could help in achieving
compatibility with a future comprehensive watershed plan. First, the
percent of impervious surface for this tract should not exceed the
percentage permissible for the watershed as a whole. A coalition of
environmental groups has a goal of limiting development to 15 percent
impervious surface for the "upper" Little Bonne Femme watershed. And
any development exceeding 8 percent impervious surface would require
implementation of approved "best management practices" to protect
water quality. Thus, up to half of the Philips tract might be
developed with 30 percent impervious surface, as suggested by John, if
the other half is devoted to open parkland.
The Gans Creek watershed portion of the tract, on the south side,
must be included in undeveloped parkland. In addition, parklands and
parking lots must be strategically dispersed to provide adequate
stream buffers. Parklands also must be managed to provide wildlife
habitat and to protect water quality. Development along Gans Road, and
particularly around any future interchange at Highway 63, should be
strictly limited. Perhaps a "Little Bonne Femme Scenic Parkway"
between Providence and Highway 63, with strict limits on both
commercial and residential development along the route, would be a
worthwhile functional and aesthetic addition to the city.
We would welcome an opportunity to share our ideas for a
watershed-based planning process with developers, landowners, city
council members, county commissioners and members of the public. We
are experts in neither environmental issues nor public policy, but
just ordinary citizens with an interest in our community. We are
working on a draft "sketch plan" for the watershed to be used to
initiate discussion of this important matter. We have neither the
responsibility nor the resources to carry out a detailed planning
process. Our goal is to encourage those responsible for land-use
planning to develop a plan that will protect both private and public
interests in this ecologically fragile area. Eventually, the entire
Highway 63 corridor from Columbia to Ashland must be planned to
protect these unique, ecologically fragile watersheds, which simply
cannot accommodate high-density, commercial development.
We believe development of the Philips tract, as part of a
comprehensive land-use plan for the Little Bonne Femme watershed,
could result in a highly desirable residential and commercial
development. This new community, with its strategic placement and
unique management of parklands, could serve as a model for development
of the rest of the Highway 63 corridor, as well as for development of
ecologically fragile land on urban fringes elsewhere.
John Ikerd is a member of the Little Bonne Femme Watershed
Partnership and an MU professor emeritus of agricultural economics.