Big picture shows growth gone wild
in planning’s absence
By KEN MIDKIFF
Published Friday, January 4, 2002
Here is what will happen, according to an attorney for a development
company, as a result of Famous-Barr - along with a whole flock of other
retail establishments slated for Columbia Commons - coming to town:
● Sales tax revenue will increase, allowing city services to be
enhanced.
● All current retail sales outlets will benefit because of the
trickle-down effect.
● Growth, which is necessary to economic life, will continue.
The flip side is that none of these will occur if the development of
Columbia Commons is not allowed, and life as we know it will end. Malls
will close, strip malls will wither and die and the downtown will be
vacated. Barstools in the campus dives will be empty. Booches will be
filled with only the memories of clacking pool balls and stale belches.
Tumbleweeds will blow down Broadway. The concrete awning in front of Cool
Stuff will crack, crumble and fall.
We’ve heard it all before, and we’re likely to hear it all again.
Developers come into town, spin their tales of a chicken in every pot,
riches for all, jobs, economic benefits, yada, yada, etc. and depending
upon when, where and how much, either get approval from one of the
planning and zoning commissions or are sent packing.
Unfortunately, the city and county planning and zoning commissions, the
Boone County Commission and the Columbia City Council are focused almost
entirely on zoning and don’t do much in the way of planning. Oh, sure,
the county has its Sorta Long Range Plan and the city has its Blurred
Vision Plan, but these are destined to follow other plans and act as
voluminous dust sponges on government office shelves.
What it all comes down to is getting to "yes." If a developer
does the homework with the neighborhood and submits a plan for a
development that more or less concurs with current thinking, chances are
good the development will get the official stamp of approval. If the
initial answer is "no," then it is back to the drawing board -
addressing areas of concern that led to the "no." Eventually,
unless the developer has a severe case of cranial-rectal inversion and
fails to appease the neighbors or to submit something vaguely addressing
P&Z members’ concerns, there will be a "yes."
Without downplaying the real and valid concerns of the residents north
of Interstate 70 and west of Route E and the likely impact to the local
environment, someone needs to take a look at what unfettered growth and
development activities are doing to our city. The big picture is not
pretty.
But that is precisely what developers and their spokes-lackeys don’t
want to happen. They would much prefer to fight the battles on a
neighborhood-by-neighborhood level. They don’t really want the planning
portion of planning and zoning to be disturbed. Leave that sleeping dog
alone.
It is time that the city council, the Boone County Commission and the
city and county planning and zoning commissions back up from the local
battles and take a hard look at what all of these developments mean for
our area.
The facts are growth is occurring at an unprecedented rate. Boone
County is one of the fastest-growing regions of the state.
While city and county officials tout "planned growth" or
"smart growth," what is occurring is pretty much unplanned and
relatively stupid. And such growth is not beneficial from any perspective
except that of rich folks from somewhere else. It is a mystery to me why
our Chamber of Commerce supports out-of-town retail establishments that
will likely run some of its members out of business or at least cut into
their profits.
Our tax rates have gone up. Bond issues for schools, parks, recreation
centers, roads, bridges, all kinds of infrastructure are on every ballot.
We don’t need more employment opportunities - we have the lowest rate of
unemployment in the state. Our quality of life has suffered, our
educational system has suffered and our crime rate has increased.
That is the cost of growth. Any reasonable cost-benefit analysis would
document that the costs are enormous and the benefits minuscule. That is
the big picture - the one developers and their ilk don’t want to
discuss.
How about promoting a stable but dynamic economy, one based on quality,
not quantity, of goods sold?
This can be done; it is being done. Some communities have rejected the
come-hither promises of unlimited growth. These communities are not
stagnant; they are vibrant and alive. Why not here?
It comes down to this: money and greed. No matter what kind of fine
words are used to describe unlimited growth, I can’t help but think
Edward Abbey phrased it best: Perpetual growth is the credo of the cancer
cell - and you know what cancer does to its host.
|